Sunday, 14 May 2017

Evaluation- Marking

1) Fairly thorough here. I didn't realise the fairground was a flashback!!
2) You chose two characters from different demographics and it would have been nice to have explored the differences in representation a little bit more
3) Not a great post as it doesn't really get to grips with different types of film company or where you could get funding. A little google searching might have gone a long way here. Did Hammer do anything other than horror?
4) Fairly general on audience. No profiles or attempt on primary/secondary. It would have been good to have been more specific on what constitutes a 15 and why this would be the ideal choice.
5) Some good understanding of marketing shown. I was interested in the Deadpool example. I think that there was a lot more to say on social media. No actual examples of marketing in evaluation.
6) Not very much detail in this post- it's really just a list of what you used!
7) A fairly thorough commentary on the process as a whole but without the specifics of a director's commentary.

Level 3 12–15 marks
• Proficient skill in the use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.
• Proficient understanding of issues around audience, institution, technology, representation, forms and conventions in relation to production.
• Proficient ability to refer to the choices made and outcomes.
• Proficient understanding of their development from preliminary to full task.
• Proficient ability to communicate.

Jamie 12

Thursday, 11 May 2017

Evaluation 7

My preliminary task was very basic. It displayed some good editing techniques, having some very good match on action editing, allowing the film to free flow easily. The task that I was set was to show that I could use the 180 degree rule, shot reverse shot, and match on action editing. I believe that my match on action editing was very good; however, with the experience that I have gained whilst doing this, I would be able to improve my preliminary task if I was to do it again by improving my shot reverse shot. From my research I found out that shot reverse shots can be used more effectively than what I had done, as shown by the research that I did about shot reverse shots. In my preliminary task I always followed the 180 degree rule, not filming from the other side of the scene; however looking back I did break the 30 degree rule at one stage, making a cut that didn’t change more than 30 degrees. If I was to re-do this preliminary task I would ensure that I did follow this rule.
I believe that my skills have improved vastly during this process and my understanding on how to film also improving. Examples of this include my ability to techniques such as the rule of thirds in my films. My film opening displayed a good se of the rule of thirds, having characters positioned in the correct place in the frame in the majority of shots, whereas in my preliminary task I didn’t display the rule of thirds at all, normally having character towards the middle of the shot.

Another director’s skill that I believe I have improved in is my ability to use sound effectively. My film opening has much more effective sound than in my preliminary task. I believe that the music that I used in my film opening was a lot more effective than what was used in my preliminary task. I have also realised the importance of having good music in a film opening, as it is one of the most important aspects to setting the genre and the tone for the rest of the film. The music that I used I feel was very effective in setting the tone and the genre of the film to come.



I believe that throughout this process my ability to edit well has also improved. My editing in the preliminary task wasn’t too bad; however I believe that I was improved. In the preliminary task, I was tasked with trying to film match on action editing, cutting in the correct place to make the film flow, whereas as my film opening was a montage style, I didn’t have to do this as much, and instead had to decide when to cut the film by the timing of the music, and giving enough time for the credits to be read.


I believe that I also improved using mise en scene in my films as I went through this work. In my preliminary task I had very little aspects of mise en scene that I took into account, whereas it was something I was more aware of when making my film opening. The props that were used in my film opening where suitable to the type of film I was making, whereas I didn’t use any props in my preliminary task that were thought about previously. I also tried to think about the lighting in my film opening as said previously saying about having to put a filter on my footage. I also gave lighting very little thought in my preliminary task, therefore believe that my understanding and ability to use mise en scene has improved form when I started this work. 

Evaluation 6

Research and Planning:
Technologies that were used in the research and planning stage of this process include using google and YouTube. I had to use google a lot whilst Researching film openings to find out what other people had found the conventions of film openings to be, get pictures to use in my blog, methods of marketing etc. I also used YouTube a lot in my research and planning, having to find clips from YouTube to either analyse or use to back up my points made.

Blogging:
I used various technologies whilst blogging. First I used the site blogger.com, which I used to make and post my blog.  I also used software such as word and power point in my blog so that I could either draft my blog before posting it, or so that I have an alternative format to put my blog in. Power point helped me do this as it allowed me to put some blogs into sections, such as the audience feedback, where I put all feedback received n individual slides.

Construction:

Whilst filming and putting together my film opening, I used various technologies. First whilst filming, I used to camera on my iPad. My whole opening was filmed on an iPad. I was going to buy a camera to film it, however decided against it as the quality of my iPad camera was good enough. I then had to use iMovie on a mac to edit my footage together.  Over this experience I learned how to and not to film using a camera, and how to edit properly, and effectively using iMovie. 

Evaluation 5









Evaluation 4

The target audience that I am targeting my film towards the age group between 17-26 year olds as my market research showed that this type of film is most suited to. However, there are lots of different age groups that I could have targeted my film towards. As I have selected this target audience, they will have certain tastes in different things, and will enjoy doing things that other age groups wouldn’t tend to do.

This age group is at an age where they are constantly using technology and are on their smart phones constantly. This age group has grown up with this technology and are can easily adapt to changes in technology. As all of this age group use their smart phones, and are also constantly on their social media apps, it is fairly easy to show them something and promote a film in a large way, showing lots of people. This makes the marketing of the film easier as you could just advertise on social media, and it would show the advert to a lot of the target audience.

I believe that this target audience would enjoy my film as it is of a genre that they enjoy, and involves the conventions of many other successful thriller films. As my target audience is aimed towards both males and females, my film will, and has, include elements that will attract both genders. I have included violent scenes in my opening and would include more of these scenes and would use more graphic scenes in the rest of my film. This would be tailored towards the male audience and is a convention that males enjoy to see in thriller films. Because I will include fairly graphic scenes in the film the BBFC rating will have to be at least 15. This is a certificate that would be ideal to my film, as it attracts my target audience because there is violence in it, and eliminates people under the age of 15 from watching the film. This however isn’t a problem as there aren’t many people under the age of 15 who watch many thriller films. My film would also be suited to females as it would include psychological questions asked towards the audience, and makes them think about the film after coming out of the cinema, like The Others for example. This is something that females like in thriller films, and prefer watching a film that includes this, rather than a film that contains gory scenes. I would aim to merge both popular conventions in my film so that the film would appeal to both genders, by having both graphic scenes and including some psychological questions that make the audience think about the story narrative.


My target audience would also enjoy films such as The Others, Pyscho, Cape Fear, Sutter island etc., because these films use conventions of thriller films that appeal to my target audience and both genders. 

Evaluation 3







Evaluation 2


I have chosen to do a comparison between John Doe and my villain, who as yet does not have a name. These 2 characters possess both similarities with each other and also various differences. Both these characters take the role of the villain in their films, and decide that it is their jobs to murder people. They both possess a desire to kill people, and are very clever and methodical about how they do it and how not to get caught. In terms of appearance these characters look very different having different ages, skin tones and build. The costumes that these characters wear is also very different as the character from my film is wearing a black hoodie and a balaclava to hide his face, and look more intimidating, whereas John Doe isn’t wearing anything to hide his appearance in any scene, and actually wants to be caught by the end of the film, so that he can finish his work, and have the final kill. 

The representation of these 2 characters is very different as they belong to two different social groups. The character from my film is seen as and represented as a troubled teenager, whereas John Doe is seen as a psychopathic middle aged man. I have a male villain in my film, as I believe that having a female antagonist wouldn’t be as effective, as the thriller audience has become so encompassed to having a male antagonist that having a female wouldn’t be as effective. I believe this is because males are typically more interested in the violence side of films, and that they are the gender that is stereotyped into murder more than females, which is why you see more male villains than females. The audience are also most use to seeing a middle aged villain such as John Doe in thriller films, alongside with little children, rather than teenagers, as they are seen as more dangerous than a teenager. I do regret not using middle aged actors in my film as they come across more scary than a teenager.